Number in DUP knew about claim over Donaldson behaviour to woman – Poots
By Jonathan McCambridge, Press Association
Stormont Speaker Edwin Poots has said “quite a number of people within the DUP” knew about concerns a woman had raised about the behaviour of Jeffrey Donaldson.
Insisting that he would never have “done anything to protect” Donaldson, Mr Poots said the former DUP leader had attempted to “extinguish” his career.
Sinn Féin has called on the Speaker to stand aside pending a DUP investigation into claims of inappropriate behaviour by Donaldson.
Mr Poots has faced pressure from several Stormont parties over his role in an incident where a woman raised concern about behaviour by Donaldson.

Sinn Féin Chief Whip Sinéad Ennis told MLAs that the incident raised “serious questions” over his role as Speaker.
Donaldson was last week convicted of 18 sex offences, including one count of rape, relating to abuse of two women when they were children.
Subsequent media reports have raised questions about how much was known within the DUP about Donaldson’s wider conduct in the period prior to his 2024 arrest over sex abuse allegations.
BBC Spotlight has reported that some senior DUP figures were aware of another woman, who was not involved in the recent court case, who had raised concerns about Donaldson’s behaviour.
In the programme, former North Antrim MP Ian Paisley said the woman did not want to make a formal complaint but he said he told Mr Poots, who was then party leader and is now Stormont Speaker, about her concerns.
Questions have also been raised around whether there was an awareness that Donaldson was allegedly engaged in behaviour in his private life that, although legal, was at odds with positions he adopted publicly.
I will be cleared of any of the accusations that have been made against me, by any individuals in this place or outside of it
The DUP is commissioning an independent review into issues raised since Donaldson was convicted.
In an interview with UVT, Mr Poots said: “On a personal level, Jeffrey Donaldson sought to drive me out of politics, he sought to extinguish my career, he sought to destroy me as a person in politics.
“My experience of Jeffrey Donaldson was hugely negative, particularly in the last five years.
“The notion that I would ever have done anything to protect Jeffrey Donaldson is something for the birds, it just wouldn’t be done.
“The notion that I would not do something to protect victims, if that was the case, was also for the birds.”
Mr Poots said that he had been told by Mr Paisley the woman had been receiving texts from Jeffrey Donaldson that “she didn’t want”.
He said there was nothing suggested to him that the claim involved anything of a safeguarding or criminal nature and that the woman did not want to take it any further.
He said: “There’s quite a number of people within the DUP knew about this. Some of them told me, other than Ian Paisley.
“There are other people who knew about this.”
Asked about calls for him to stand aside from his position as Stormont Speaker, Mr Poots said: “There is not one smidgeon of evidence of wrongdoing on my part.
“Nobody has provided any evidence.”
In the Northern Ireland Assembly on Tuesday, SDLP Opposition leader Matthew O’Toole asked about standing orders for recall of MLAs over the summer recess to ask further questions about the fallout from the Donaldson conviction and to express confidence or otherwise in the Speaker or others.
Mr Poots responded: “You know full well the rules.
“If anybody has any notion that I done anything to protect Jeffrey Donaldson, after all that he had done to me previously, they are living in some other world or other planet.
“I will be cleared of any of the accusations that have been made against me, by any individuals in this place or outside of it.
“Because I have done nothing wrong, I make that absolutely clear.
“I would never have protected Jeffrey Donaldson in any circumstance had he done wrong, but given what he had done to me in particular, previous to that, I definitely wouldn’t have.”
I am calling for the Speaker to now stand aside pending the full disclosure of all of the issues and any and all knowledge of them within the DUP
Earlier, Ms Ennis raised concerns about Mr Poots’s position.
She said: “Revelations over recent days that members of the DUP, including the Assembly Speaker Edwin Poots, had knowledge of the exploitation of a young woman by the now convicted paedophile Jeffrey Donaldson raises serious questions for the DUP.
“Even if we accept that there were no criminal or safeguarding issues, and that remains to be seen; there was clearly knowledge of inappropriate behaviour by Donaldson, which, according to the current DUP leader (Gavin Robinson), was not passed to the party officers.
“The result of this is that these issues were not raised or dealt with, even as the DUP elevated Donaldson to the leadership of the DUP, effectively Donaldson’s behaviour was ignored, and in terms of this Assembly, it raises serious questions for Edwin Poots as Assembly Speaker.
“This is at best a gross misjudgement by the Speaker, at worst it is a fundamental and disastrous moral failure.”

Ms Ennis told MLAs that a “dangerous paedophile went unchallenged”.
She added: “Worse still, and despite clear and knowing red flags, he was elected leader of the DUP.
“On that basis, I am calling for the Speaker to now stand aside pending the full disclosure of all of the issues and any and all knowledge of them within the DUP about inappropriate behaviour before and during Donaldson’s time as DUP leader.”
On Monday, current DUP leader Gavin Robinson said “it is clear” there are former and current DUP members who had information about the conduct of Donaldson which was not shared with the party.
DUP leader Mr Robinson told the BBC Talkback programme on Tuesday that he has “no reason to doubt” Mr Poots’s account of his handling of concerns raised by the woman about Donaldson.
Mr Robinson said other political parties had used the situation for “political purpose”.
He said: “The hypocrisy that lies behind those in politics using this tragedy for their own political ends, it’s not only disappointing but I think it’s clear for the public to see.
“We won’t leave any stone unturned, we’re bringing someone in who is independent to conduct this review in a way no other party has, including those hypocrites in Stormont who now seem to be pointing one finger and forget that three point back at them.”

